PRESS RELEASE
KALAT, Balochistan -- The
Baloch in Oman are expressing their solidarity for their brethrens in
Pakistani-occupied and Iranian-occupied Balochistan. Below are photos
showing the Flag of Balochistan pasted on an American-made Chevrolet
Cavalier:
.jpg)
.jpg)
Baloch News Bureau Report
Mir Azaad Khan Baloch
General Secretary
The Government of Balochistan in Exile
http://governmentofbalochistan.blogspot.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balochis in Oslo protest upon
arrival of PM
01-09-2006
OSLO: Balochi leaders and
workers belonging from various organizations in Norway staged a protest
demonstration on the arrival of Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz in Oslo.
A large number of Baloch protested outside the hotel in which Shaukat Aziz
addressed the Pakistani community soon after his arrival and then later
outside the Norwegian parliament.
The protestors were carrying huge portraits of Nawab Akbar Bugti, flag of
Balochistan, banners and play cards.
Balochis from neighbouring countries of Denmark, Sweden, Germany and other
countries also came to Oslo to join in the protest.
Baloch Action Committee Spokesman Ahsan Arjmandi Baloch talking to
reporters told that Baloch Action Committee has met Norwegian advisor on
South Asia Affairs and have told her that Pakistan government has stored
nuclear resources in Balochistan which is hurting the environment as well
as endangering the lives of the people.
He said that the Balochi people are suffering from the after effects of
the 1998 nuclear tests, water is contaminated, irrigation is suffering,
defected children are being born and cases of cancer are on the rise.
Norwegian advisor assured that they will look into the matter and would
obtain a report in this regard through its embassy in Islamabad.
Balochi delegation also asked that Norway government should also raise its
voice against the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti like US and India.
http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=101763
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baloch in Nimroz condemns
Bugti's death
ZARANJ, Aug 29 (Pajhwok Afghan News): Baloch living on this side of the
border Tuesday condemned the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti in a military
operation in Pakistan's Balochistan province on Saturday.
A meeting, attended by around 4,000 Baloch, was held in the Jame Mosque of
the western Nimroz province to offer Fateha (prayer) for the soul of the
deceased Baloch nationalist leader.
The participants praised late Nawab Bugti for his courage and bravery and
offered him rich tributes. Addressing the gathering, Maulvi Mohammad
Sarwar, an ethnic Baloch and head of the provincial court said Bugti's
death was a great loss for the entire Baloch nation.
Baloch people are inhabiting the border areas of the three neighbours,
Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran. About 30,000 Baloch are living in the
western Nimroz province.
Akbar Khan Bugti was killed along with his family members and comrades in
an air and ground operation conducted by the Pakistan army. Bugti's death
was widely condemned by almost all Pakistani political parties while the
two cities of Quetta and Karzachi were paralysed by strike and violent
protests.
Mustafa Kazimi
by/dk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baloch in Kabul mourn
Bugti's death
KABUL, Aug 30 (Pajhwok Afghan News): Afghanistan's ethnic Baloch community
on Wednesday offered Fateha (prayer) for late Nawab Akbar Bugti, who was
killed in a military operation in Pakistan's Balochistan province on
Saturday.
The prayer offered at Kabul's main Eidgah Mosque, was also attended by
speaker of the Wolesi Jirga Younus Qauni and Minister for Labour and
Social Affairs Noor Mohammad Qarqin.
This is the second time Fateha is being offered for the Baloch leader in
Afghanistan. Earlier, a similar ceremony was held in the western province
of Nimroz which was attended by more than 4,000 ethnic Baloch.
The Fateha for Bugti is offered at a time when the country will observe
solidarity day with Pashtuns and Baloch communities on the other side of
the Durand Line tomorrow (Thursday). August 31 is celebrated solidarity
day with Pashtuns and Baloch since 1955.
Prominent Pashtun and Baloch leaders from the other side of the border are
expected to attend the main function of the day at the Pashtunistan Square
in Kabul.
Secretary to the Minister for Borders and Tribal Affairs Haji Ghulam
Dastagir told Pajhwok Afghan News the ministry had adopted special
arrangements to celebrate the day. At the same time, solidarity will be
expressed with Baloch community who had lost their leader, added Dastagir.
Abdul Rauf Liwal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bugti killing tragic, says
Rajnath
Special Correspondent
http://www.hindu.com/2006/08/31/stories/2006083103821300.htm
31-08-2006
Nawab Bugti
NEW DELHI: Bharatiya Janata Party president Rajnath Singh Wednesday
expressed concern over the killing of Baloch leader Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti
by the Pakistan army.
It was tragic that the Pakistan Government had killed one of their leaders
while providing hideouts to the Al-Qaeda and other terrorist outfits, he
said.
In a statement, he said it seemed that Pakistan had not learnt any lesson
from its misadventure in 1971 in then East Pakistan and now Bangladesh.
The killing of Bugti exposed the duplicity and double standards of
Pakistan's military establishment. Islamabad was taking no effective
action against terror groups. Instead, Pakistan had become a safe
sanctuary for them, he said.
India should initiate appropriate diplomatic efforts to ensure stability
in Balochistan, he added.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ambassador Oakley calls Nawab
Bugti a martyr
31 Aug 2006
WASHINGTON DC -- Former
U.S. Ambassador Robert Oakley on Thursday called Nawab Akbar Bugti a
martyr.
In a condolence message sent to U.S.- based Baloch journalist Ahmar
Mustikhan, Oakley said "No doubt he welcomed a martyr’s death, in
combat. We shall all miss him."
Oakley is said to have become a close personal friend of Bugti during his
posting as U.S. envoy to Pakistan .
Oakley said he worked together closely with Nawab Bugti and had developed
a good personal relationship during his period as US Ambassador to
Pakistan 1988-1991.
According to analysts, Nawab Bugti's one-on-one meetings with Oakley
earned him the ire of the Pakistan intelligence establishment. Nawab
Bugti's son Salal Bugti was killed the year after Oakley completed his
stint as ambassador.
"Behind his idiosyncrasies, he was a very intelligent man committed to
what he saw as best for his country as well as his tribe and clan, open to
reason," Oakley said.
The Pakistani intelligence feared Nawab Bugti might have conveyed to
Oakley the Baloch aspirations for an independent state.
"Nawab Akbar Bugti leaves behind a myriad of friends and admirers, of
which I am certainly one," Oakley said.
Source: BalochUnity
YahooGroup
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afghanistan: Pakistani Tribal
Leader's Killing Touches Nerve
http://www.rferl.org
By Amin Tarzi
Will Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and Afghan President Hamid
Karzai continue to so friendly?
(epa)
WASHINGTON, August 31, 2006 (RFE/RL) -- As Pakistan faces a backlash after
the killing of Baluch tribal leader Nawab Akbar Bugti on August 26,
Islamabad has rejected criticism from New Delhi and Kabul, calling the
incident an internal affair.
Violent protests have raged in Pakistan, especially in Baluchistan, since
Baluch tribal leader Bugti was killed in unclear circumstances during an
attack by Pakistani security forces on his cave hideout on August 26.
Meanwhile, Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz survived a confidence
vote on August 29 -- only the second time a no-confidence motion has been
made in parliament against a prime minister since Pakistan's establishment
in 1947.
Bugti's relationship with the central government in Pakistan was marked by
highs and lows, but in general the tribal leader had advocated more
economic and political autonomy for Baluchistan through insurgencies and
by using the Jamhuri Watan Party, which he founded and has led since 1990.
There are reports that Bugti -- who actually served briefly as governor of
Baluchistan in the 1970s -- was a backer of the Baluchistan Liberation
Army (BLA), a group that advocates violence in seeking an independent
Baluch state.
While Pakistan deals with the fallout from Bugti's death, Islamabad has
made it explicitly clear that the entire affair is an internal matter,
specifically telling Afghanistan and India to refrain from meddling.
Reaction From Kabul, New Delhi
Afghan President Hamid Karzai's spokesman and the country's National
Assembly have condemned Bugti's killing. During a debate in the Wolesi
Jirga (People's Council), members of parliament on August 28 debated the
issue. While some Afghan lawmakers pointed out that Bugti's killing was
Pakistan's internal affair, many called the action by Pakistan "an
inhumane act." Pakistan says it did not intend to harm Bugti and that he
was killed by explosives that went off after a Pakistani bomb attack.
Bugti's case is "indeed the internal affair of Pakistan, but it also has a
connection with the people of Afghanistan, because we have always defended
the rights of the Baluch and Afghans [Pashtuns living in the Northwest
Frontier Province]," Kabul-based Tolu Television quoted an unidentified
Afghan parliamentarian as saying. Another unnamed Wolesi Jirga member
condemned Bugti's killing on "behalf of the people of Afghanistan," and
expressed sympathy to the "Baluch tribe and all freedom fighters of the
world."
The Indian Foreign Ministry called the killing of Bugti "unfortunate" and
a "tragic loss to the people of Baluchistan and Pakistan." Indian media
has generally been much more critical of Pakistan's handling of the
affairs in Baluchistan.
Islamabad's Concerns
Substantiated or not, since 2003 Islamabad has accused its arch-nemesis
India of setting up camps in Afghanistan to train Afghans and Pakistanis
as terrorists to destabilize Pakistan, especially in Baluchistan.
Pakistan charges that with the presence of Indian troops in Afghanistan,
New Delhi is encircling Pakistan with consulates and commandos and is
financing militant organizations, namely the BLA.
While Karzai has repeatedly said that Afghanistan's relations with India
"in no way" have an impact on ties between Kabul and Islamabad, the
similar reaction from New Delhi and Kabul regarding Bugti's killing
certainly does not help to quiet Islamabad's anxieties (see "RFE/RL
Afghanistan Report," April 26, 2006).
Responding to a question about Afghan and Indian concerns about Bugti's
killing, Pakistani military spokesman Major General Shaukat Sultan said on
August 29 that his country's Foreign Office has issued a clear statement
on the comments made by Kabul and New Delhi, deeming them a "violation of
all diplomatic norms."
Sultan added that these comments "point to the fact that if something
happens in Baluchistan, [we know] who is involved in it." He did not
elaborate but left no doubt that Pakistan sees an Indian hand with Afghan
collaboration in Baluchistan unrest.
The Bugti affair once again brings attention to the need for Kabul not to
exacerbate its already troubled relationship with Islamabad. While
Pakistan needs to accept Afghanistan as an independent country -- one not
subservient to its demands -- Kabul has to be careful not to play the
Pashtun and Baluch card or get involved in the Indian-Pakistani games so
much that Islamabad goes on high alert.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Cluster bombs’ killed Bugti
Official version of cave
collapse pooh-poohed Asia News International
Quetta, August 30
Nawabzada Hyrbair Marri
has alleged that cluster bombs were used to kill Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti
and other tribesmen in last Saturday’s military operation in the Kohlu
Hills.
Rejecting the government’s claims that Nawab Bugti had died because of the
collapse of his cave hideout, Marri said the armed forces had targeted him
with gunship helicopters and jet fighters.
“The story of the cave’s collapse is a propaganda ruse of the rulers to
deceive the people,” Marri was quoted by The Dawn, as saying.
Issuing an appeal to the world media to visit the site of Nawab Bugti’s
killing to expose the real truth behind the operation, Marri said Nawab
Bugti’s death was planned and not an accident as was being touted by
Islamabad.
He was reacting to a statement issued by Major-Gen Shaukat Sultan,
Director-General, Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), who said Nawab
Bugti had not been killed by the Pakistan Army, but in an accident.
Major-General Sultan claimed that the terrain was very rugged and almost
inaccessible. He said a tribesman from the Bugti clan, who was guiding
law-enforcement agencies, had earlier entered the cave and confirmed the
presence of people inside, including Nawab Akbar Bugti.
After sometime, the guide returned to the commanding officer of
law-enforcement agencies, who then went inside the cave. During this
process, the cave collapsed all of sudden, leaving all inmates of the cave
dead, he said.
Maj-General Sultan said the commanding officer had gone into the cave to
negotiate with Nawab Akbar Bugti for his arrest as the government had
intended to take him into custody. He said there was no confirmation about
the presence of any of the kinsmen of Nawab Bugti.
Giving details of the incidents between August 24 and 26, Maj-General
Sultan said during the three days of engagement, seven personnel of the
law-enforcement agencies were killed, including four officers, one JCO and
two of other ranks.
He further said the bodies of the law enforcers were recovered on August
26 and August 27 as they had not covered much distance inside the cave and
the rituals were carried out on August 28.
Nawabzada Marri, however, urged the Baluch people to unite in the face of
aggression.
IANS adds from ISLAMABAD: In an effort to deflect mounting criticism of
its military operation that killed Baluchistan’s separatist leader Nawab
Akbar Bugti, the Pakistani authorities are now saying that the cave in
which the Baluch leader, was hiding collapsed due to an explosion.
Giving the official version to counter what he called “deliberate
disinformation,” Major-General Sultan, Director-General, Inter Services
Public Relations (ISPR), said: “A guide was sent into the cave. The moment
he came out, the Commanding Officer immediately rushed into the cave along
with two other officers and troops. When the officers went inside the
cave, a large explosion occurred and the cave collapsed.” He said a Bugti
tribe guide accompanying the paramilitary forces confirmed that Akbar
Bugti was inside the cave. The guide survived, as he was behind the
officers at the time of the cave’s collapse.
“Yes, he (guide) met and spoke to Nawab Bugti,” The Nation quoted Maj-General
Sultan as telling the media.
“Nawab Bugti was hiding in a cave that collapsed after a big explosion
burying the officers who were entering the cave to talk to Nawab Bugti.”
He said a heavy cache of arms had been recovered from the spot besides a
box containing an amount of Rs 100 million (About $16,00,000). “Another
box contains $96,000 and few papers.” He said it could have been an
explosion or firing that caused the collapse of the cave. “We are not sure
about it as the people who could have the knowledge were buried under the
rubble. Two bodies of the officers were taken out the same evening while
the remaining three bodies were taken out on August 27.” To a question,
Maj-General Sultan reiterated that probably the officers went inside the
cave to negotiate with Nawab Akbar Bugti but the cave collapsed. “Every
effort was being made to apprehend him (Bugti) alive and not to kill him.”
Giving details of the incident on August 26, near Kohlu, Baluchistan, he
said he was unable to confirm the presence of Nawab Bugti’s two grandsons
inside the cave.
He said army engineers had carried out a survey of the site and in their
opinion the debris could only be removed manually. “Army engineers are
prepared to work and the whole process, if started, will likely to take
four to five days.”
He said the engineers were sent who carried out a survey of the collapsed
cave. In their opinion any use of explosive to remove the rubble was
likely to result in the complete collapse of the cave.
“The use of heavy machinery is also highly dangerous as a minor vibration
can result into the collapse of the whole structure. There is also no
place for heavy machinery to work there,” Maj-General Sultan added.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
News
AMNESTY
INTERNATIONAL
PRESS RELEASE
AI Index: ASA 04/001/2006 (Public)
News Service No: 221
Embargo Date: 30 August 2006 01:00 GMT
South Asia:
'War on terror' spawns new patterns of enforced disappearance
Published
New patterns of enforced disappearance related to the "war on terror" have
emerged in South Asia alongside the long-standing problems in countries such
as Nepal and Sri Lanka. In all cases, the families of the victims suffer
emotionally, socially and financially, said Amnesty International on
International Day of the Disappeared.
Amnesty International believes that several hundreds of people have become
victims of enforced disappearances in Pakistan in the context of the "war on
terror". Whilst many of those have eventually been acknowledged as being
held in Guatanamo Bay, others are believed still to be held in Pakistani
detention although their precise whereabouts remain unknown. Some people
were released after receiving threats not to reveal details about their
detention, while others were subsequently criminally charged. In at least
one case, the body of a victim of enforced disappearance was found six
months after he had been captured. The fate or whereabouts of many others
remain unknown
Meanwhile, there are fears that a pattern of enforced disappearance by state
agents is re-emerging in Sri Lanka following the introduction of new
Emergency Regulations in August 2005 that granted sweeping powers to the
security forces. Sixty-two cases of enforced disappearance in the north of
the country have been registered by the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka
over the past year. The Commission is also investigating the status of 183
other individuals who are still missing under unknown circumstances.
"South Asia has a history of enforced disappearances, with tens of thousands
of people going missing over past decades in countries such as Nepal and Sri
Lanka. It is very disappointing to see countries such as Pakistan join in a
trend that one would hope would be declining," said Catherine Baber, Deputy
Asia Pacific Director at Amnesty International.
"Enforced disappearance is a gross violation of international human rights
and humanitarian law. It affects not only the victims but also takes a heavy
toll on their families. Relatives are left to agonise over the fate of their
loved ones in the face of official denials and contradictions. They are
harrassed in their attempts to obtain information and face financial
difficulties when the victim is the breadwinner."
The fate and whereabouts of Pakistani Saifullah Paracha was unknown
for six weeks after he was taken into US custody on arrival at Bangkok
airport on 5 July 2003. His wife Fatah Paracha told Amnesty International
that the events had "emotionally devastated the whole family". "Can
you imagine the mental agony and anxiety we experienced as a family when
this happened and there was no response from anyone?...[Our children] are no
longer carefree children but have become suspicious and worried... All
friends of the family have backed off, everyone is scared to know us."
Saifullah Paracha is now known to be held at Guantanamo Bay, but his family
have no idea how long he will remain there.
The families of thousands of victims of enforced disappearance remain in
limbo, whilst the fate of their relative remains unknown. In Nepal, a
government committee announced in July that it was investigating more than
600 outstanding cases of enforced disappearance, but local activists say
there are more than 1000 individuals who are unaccounted for. Sri Lanka has
one of the highest levels of unresolved enforced disappearances in the
world. In the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, an estimated 8,000- 10,000
enforced disappearances have been reported since 1989. While fewer new cases
are reported now, there is still no information about past cases.
Faced with a lack of official action, some family members have set up mutual
support groups. One is the Association of the Parents of Disappeared Persons
in Jammu and Kashmir, which provides support to relatives including the
"half widows" -- women who are deprived of compensation so long as they
refuse to declare their husbands dead.
Armed groups are often implicated in the abduction of people who speak out
against them, with some victims held for months and even years in secret
locations. In Nepal, thousands of abductions are believed to have been
carried out by Maoist fighters over the decade-long conflict; more than 330
such people are still missing, according to the country's National Human
Rights Commission.
New cases of enforced disappearance continue to emerge in South Asian
countries. In Sri Lanka, eight Tamil men did not return home on 6 May when
they went to decorate a Hindu temple in preparation for a religious
festival. Their families reported them missing the following morning, saying
they had seen Sri Lanka army personnel at the temple during the night. The
mens' whereabouts remain unknown.
In Pakistan, the indifference shown to the enforced disappearance of terror
suspects has contributed to its spread beyond "war on terror" related cases.
The enforced disappearance of members of other groups such as Baloch and
Sindhi nationalists are now also being reported. Courts are swamped with
habeas corpus petitions to determine victims' whereabouts. State agents
routinely deny holding the victims or knowing anything about their fate or
whereabouts.
"People should be arrested and detained according to the law, not forced
into a van in the middle of the night and swept off to an anonymous
detention centre where they risk torture and further abuses. Individuals
have the right to challenge their detention, to see a lawyer of their
choosing and talk to their families. Families have a right to know where
their relatives are," said Catherine Baber.
Notes to Editors
Amnesty International will be releasing a report on enforced disappearances
related to the "war on terror" in Pakistan later this year. If you would
like to receive this report, please contact the press office.
Amnesty International is lobbying for the draft International Convention
for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance to be
adopted by consensus and without amendment at the 61st session of the UN
General Assembly this year.
To see an Amnesty International factsheet about enforced disappearances in
the "war on terror", please go to:
http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engact400132005
AFAD, the Asian Federation Against Enforced Disappearance, is the regional
body of support groups formed by relatives of the victims of enforced
disappearance. Its website is at
http://www.desaparecidos.org/afad/.
Public Document
****************************************
For more information please
call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566
Amnesty International, 1
Easton St., London WC1X 0DW. web:
http://www.amnesty.org********
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solidarity Day observed with
Pashtuns, Baloch
KABUL, Aug 31 (Pajhwok Afghan News): Hundreds of Pashtuns and Baloch
gathered here on Thursday to observe the Solidarity Day with Pashtuns and
Baloch on the other side of the Durand Line.
The day is being observed every year on August 31 in Kabul since 1955.
However, this year, the event was dominated by the killing of Baloch leader
Akbar Bugti in a military operation in Pakistan and the participants
unanimously condemned the act.
The Solidarity Day function was held in the Khushal Khan High School.
Besides hundreds of Pashtun and Baloch tribal elders and government
officials, Minister for Borders and Tribal Affairs Karim Barahavi and
advisor to President Hamid Karzai on cultural affairs Zalmay Heewadmal also
attended the ceremony.
Addressing the gathering, Karim Barahavi said not only Pashtuns and Baloch
but all Afghans should develop unity in their ranks. He said the day was a
part of Afghanistan's history.
On this occasion, the elders expressed grief and sorrow over the killing of
Bugti and termed the government of Pakistan responsible for his death.
Akram Shinwari, a tribal elder, in his address to the gathering, said the
killing of a leader could not put an end to their independence struggle. He
said they fully share the grief of their Baloch brethren.
Nadir Khan, member of the Wolesi Jirga from Paktika, said Bugti's killing
would prove a great blow to the government of Pakistan.
Zubair Babakarkhail
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan Army launched
another operation in different areas of Kohlu
Dawn.com
QUETTA, Sept 3: The
Anjuman Ittehad Marri (AIM) has said that security forces have launched
another operation in different areas of Kohlu district and many people
have been killed.
An AIM spokesman said here on Sunday that the security forces were using
helicopter gunships and fighter jets against militants who were offering
strong resistance.
He said that helicopter gunships had pounded Tartani, Bhamboor, Surian Kor
and other areas of Kohlu district, killing at least 18 people, including
women and children.
He claimed that 70 families comprising 350 people were missing.
The spokesman further said that law-enforcement agencies had recently
arrested over 20 people from the New Kahan area near Quetta.
He said that after the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti, more troops and heavy
weapons had arrived in Kohlu district... (Dawn)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baloch and Sindhis
Demonstrate in London
By Walid Garboni
03-09-2006

Hundreds of Baloch and
Sindhis gathered in London and demonstrated outside the British prime
minister house on 3 September 2006 at 1pm local time.
The demonstrators had held placards with slogans ‘We condemn the killing
of Nawab Akbar Bugti by Pakistan govt’ Stop supplying arms to Pakistan’
Shame on Pakistani Army’ shame on Musharraf’ Pakistan is Mother of Evils’
Nawab Bugti shall live in our hearts and minds for ever’ No Pakistan, No
Al Qaeda’ We demand international intervention in Balochistan’ Stop
Criminal Pakistani Military Operation in Balochistan’
The
demonstration was addressed by prominent Baloch and Sindhi leaders who
strongly condemned the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti. Amongst the Speakers
were Mr. Hussain of Greater Balochistan National Congress, Dr Doshoki of
BUF, Jamshid Amiri of BUF-D, Rahim Baloch of BPP.
It appeared that the attitude of Baloch and Sindhi groups have changed
towards a harder line than what was seen in previous demonstrations. When
a banner was displayed by some individual stating ‘ Faujiun door hatu
Pakistan hamara hay’ (army keep away Pakistan is ours), the demonstrators
angrily remove and destroyed the banner.
Another group carrying
Pakistani flag and a banner on which was written ‘We are Pakistanis and We
love Baloches, Sindhis, Pashtuns and Punjabis’ wanted to join the
demonstration was stopped by the police on the demand of demonstrators and
was sent away.
In this demonstration a new speaker Mr. G Hussain Baloch immerged with a
powerful speech. Speaking on behalf of Greater Balochistan National
Congress he said ‘Baloch and Sindhis have been gathering again and again
since the start of operation in Balochistan and have urged Her Majesty’s
government to intervene and we are here again and ask Mr. Blair to voice
against the ongoing army operation in Balochistan.’
He added ‘we are talking
about the Balochistan which was sliced and divided between Pakistan, Iran
and Afghanistan by the British Empire.’
Mr. Hussain was the only speaker who voiced against Iranian oppression of
Baloch people and said ‘the peace loving, democracy loving, secular minded
people of Balochistan are being bombed, arrested, tortured, killed and
imprisoned by the occupying forces of Iran and Pakistan and yet the
international community is silence on this.’
On behalf of Greater
Balochistan National Congress he thanked governments of India and
Afghanistan for condemning Pakistan over the killing of Nawab Akbar Khan
Bugti.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man hanged in public in
volatile Iran province
Iran
Focus
Tehran,
Iran, Sep. 05 – A man was hanged in public on Monday in one of Iran’s most
volatile provinces.
The man, identified as Gholam-Reza Rigi, was publicly hanged at dawn in
the town of Saravan, the official news agency IRNA reported.
He was accused of drug smuggling.
Iranian authorities routinely execute dissidents on the bogus charge of
drug smuggling.
Saravan is situated in the south-eastern province of Sistan-va-Baluchestan
which has been a hotbed of anti-government activities.
In recent months, Iranian authorities have stepped up executions in the
restive province in what many Baluchis believe is a response to a spate of
attacks by dissidents on government and security officials.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006-09-06
Below is an extract of an article published by
Alsumaria an Iraki satellite network:
“What are the reasons
behind the “two flags” crisis between Kurdistan and
Baghdad? Why did Iraqi Kurdistan
President take such a decision at the current time? What would be the
implications of his decision on reconciliation project? How does President
Jalal Talabani regard this issue?
The political noise that followed the President of Iraqi Kurdistan decision
to lower the Iraqi national flag in Kurdistan and the statement made by
Prime Minister Nuri Maliki that the Iraqi flag is the only flag that should
be raised over any square inch of Iraq until the Parliament passes a
resolution concerning this issue in conformity with the constitution, pushed
Barazani to explain his motives by saying that the aim was limited to
arrangements perspectives. However, the repercussions of this issue aroused
the fears of some political parties. They considered that it might hinder
the next meeting of Dialogue and Reconciliation Committee to be held in
Arbil during the ongoing month. In this context, Head of Iraqi Accordance
front, Adnan Al Dulaymi was surprised by the timing of Barazani’s
declaration especially since the prevailing talks nowadays are about
reconciliation.”
Moreover, many MPs expected the “two flags crisis” to be a fervent issue
during the next Parliament session while the Coalition MPs insist on keeping
the same agenda in the current time.Saleh Al Motlak, Head of Iraqi Dialogue
Front, has called on President Jalal Talabani to decide on this matter.
Source
Alsumaria news
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iraqi Kurdistan: Push for a
National Anthem
2006-09-06
Iraqi Kurds are preparing to declare their national anthem following the
decree of Massoud Barzani, president of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG)
in northern Iraq, which banned the Iraqi flag in the Kurdish region.
The KRG’s call for a national anthem came at a point when debates over
Barzani’s threat to found an independent state are heating up.
The Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), a member of the KRG, released a
statement on its official website informing another important issue, aside
from the flag decree, was the preparation of a national anthem for the
Kurdish region.
The statement was penned by former PUK Politburo member Karwan Enwer and
reads: “The national anthem issue has not been attached adequate
significance since the 1991 Kurdish revolt against the Saddam regime.
Television channels have broadcasted thousands of love music videos.
However, we have failed to write a national anthem acceptable to our
citizens.”
Kurdistan Democratic Party leader Massoud Barzani had issued a notice on
Friday banning the current Iraqi flag from all official buildings in the
Kurdish region.
In the face of reactions from Sunni and Turkoman leaders, Iraqi Prime
Minister Nuri al-Maliki ordered the Iraqi flag to be hoisted on every inch
of the Iraqi soil.
Source
Zaman Daily News
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Pakistan: The Worsening Conflict
in Balochistan
Asia Report N°119
14 September 2006
Click here to view the full report as a PDF file in A4
format.
For more information about viewing PDF documents, please
click here.
This document is also available in
MS-Word format
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
President
Pervez Musharraf and the military are responsible for the
worsening of the conflict in Balochistan. Tensions between
the government and its Baloch opposition have grown
because of Islamabad’s heavy-handed armed response to
Baloch militancy and its refusal to negotiate demands for
political and economic autonomy. The killing of Baloch
leader Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti in August 2006 sparked riots
and will likely lead to more confrontation. The conflict
could escalate if the government insists on seeking a
military solution to what is a political problem and the
international community, especially the U.S., fails to
recognise the price that is involved for security in
neighbouring Afghanistan.
Tensions with
the central government are not new to Balochistan, given
the uneven distribution of power, which favors the
federation at the cost of the federal units. The Baloch
have long demanded a restructured relationship that would
transfer powers from what is seen as an exploitative
central government to the provinces. But Musharraf’s
authoritarian rule has deprived them of participatory,
representative avenues to articulate demands and to voice
grievances. Politically and economically marginalised,
many Baloch see the insurgency as a defensive response to
the perceived colonisation of their province by the
Punjabi-dominated military.
Although
regional parties still seek provincial autonomy within a
federal parliamentary democratic framework, and there is,
as yet, little support for secession, militant sentiments
could grow if Islamabad does not reverse ill-advised
policies that include:
-
exploitation of Balochistan’s natural resources
without giving the province its due share;
-
construction of further military garrisons to
strengthen an already extensive network of military
bases; and
-
centrally
driven and controlled economic projects, such as the
Gwadar deep sea port, that do not benefit locals but
raise fears that the resulting influx of economic
migrants could make the Baloch a minority in their
homeland.
While Baloch
alienation is widespread, crossing tribal, regional and
class lines, the military government insists that a few
sardars (tribal leaders) are challenging the centre’s
writ, concerned that their power base would be eroded by
Islamabad’s plans to develop Balochistan; the state
therefore has little option but to meet the challenge head
on. This failure to accept the legitimacy of grievances
lies at the heart of an increasingly intractable conflict,
as does Islamabad’s reliance on coercion and
indiscriminate force to silence dissent.
The military
government should recognise that it faces conflict not
with a handful of sardars but with a broad-based movement
for political, economic and social empowerment. The only
one way out is to end all military action, release
political prisoners and respect constitutionally
guaranteed political freedoms.
As a
preliminary confidence-building measure, Islamabad should
implement recommendations of the Parliamentary Committee
on Balochistan, which have local support. But a
sustainable solution requires implementation, in spirit
and substance, of constitutional provisions for political,
administrative and economic autonomy. The federation would
also be strengthened if the national parliament were to
amend the constitution, to shift powers from an
overbearing centre to the provinces. However, centralised
rule is the hallmark of authoritarianism. Like its
predecessors, this military government is averse to
democratic engagement and powersharing, preferring to
retain and consolidate power through patron-client
relations and divide-and-rule strategies.
Reliance on
the Pashtun religious parties to counter its Baloch
opposition has strengthened Pashtun Islamist forces at the
cost of the moderate Baloch. With their chief Pakistani
patron, Fazlur Rehman’s Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam running the
Balochistan government in alliance with Musharraf’s Muslim
League (Quaid-i-Azam), a reinvigorated Afghan and
Pakistani Taliban are attacking international forces and
the Kabul government across Balochistan’s border with
Afghanistan. But the international community, particularly
the U.S. and its Western allies, seem to ignore the
domestic and regional implications of the Balochistan
conflict, instead placing their faith in a military
government that is targeting the anti-Taliban Baloch and
Pashtuns and rewarding pro-Taliban Pashtun parties.
With the
federal government refusing to compromise with its Baloch
opponents, intent on a military solution to a political
problem and ignoring local stakeholders in framing
political and economic policies, the directions of the
conflict are clear. The military can retain control over
Balochistan’s territory through sheer force, but it cannot
defeat an insurgency that has local support.
Still, the
conflict could be resolved easily. Free and fair elections
in 2007 would restore participatory representative
institutions, reducing tensions between the centre and the
province, empowering moderate forces and marginalising
extremists in Balochistan. In the absence of a democratic
transition, however, the militancy is unlikely to subside.
The longer the conflict continues, the higher the costs –
political, social and economic for a fragile polity.
1. End
reliance on a military solution in Balochistan and quickly
take the following steps to deescalate:
(a) cease
military action, send the armed forces back to the
barracks and restrict their role to guarding the
province’s land and nautical borders;
(b)
withdraw the Frontier Corps, replacing it with
provincial security forces that are firmly under
provincial control;
(c)
dismantle all check posts manned by paramilitary and
other federal security agencies; and
(d) halt
construction of military bases (cantonments) and end
plans to construct additional military or paramilitary
facilities.
2. Respect
democratic freedoms by:
(a)
producing immediately all detainees before the courts
and releasing political prisoners;
(b) ending
the political role of intelligence agencies, military
and civil, and barring them from detaining prisoners;
(c)
withdrawing travel restrictions, internal and external,
on Baloch opposition leaders and activists;
(d) ending
intimidation, torture, arbitrary arrests, disappearances
and extra-judicial killings;
(e)
allowing all political parties to function freely,
respecting the constitutionally guaranteed rights of
speech and expression, assembly, association and
movement; and
(f)
respecting the constitutional obligation to preserve and
promote distinct language and culture.
3. Entrust
the Baloch with more responsibility for their own security
by:
(a)
accepting provincial jurisdiction over law and order and
policing;
(b)
retaining Balochistan Levies, re-establishing those that
have been disbanded, reforming them into a professional
force accountable to provincial authority and replacing
them by the police only once police reform has been
enacted countrywide;
(c)
ensuring that locals are recruited to the police force
and Levies in Balochistan; and
(d)
meeting the quota for Baloch recruitment in the armed
forces and federal security agencies.
4. Allow
local and international media unhindered access to all
districts in Balochistan, including the conflict zones.
5. Begin
immediately a dialogue with all regional and
national-level political parties on ways of solving the
crisis and create a favorable environment for such a
dialogue by:
(a)
implementing at once recommendations of the Mushahid
Hussain parliamentary subcommittee, particularly those
that pertain to revised gas royalties, social sector
expenditure by the federation as well as oil and gas
companies, and jobs for Baloch in the federal government
and its institutions;
(b)
establishing and empowering the special task force
proposed by the Mushahid Hussain subcommittee to monitor
and implement these recommendations;
(c)
revising the distribution criteria for National Finance
Commission awards to account for backwardness, level of
development, geographic size, and revenue levels of the
provinces; and
(d)
reviving the moribund Council of Common Interests,
accepting parliamentary authority over the body, and
accepting and implementing its decisions.
6. Ensure
sustainable development with local ownership by:
(a)
meeting Baloch concerns about Gwadar Port by placing the
project under provincial government control; ending the
practice of allocating coastal lands to security
agencies; giving local fishermen unimpeded access to
their fishing grounds; revising the “master plan” so
locals are not dislocated; addressing pressing health
and education needs, with an emphasis on new technical
institutes and colleges; and implementing job quotas for
locals at the port and related projects;
(b)
ensuring in Sui and other oil and gas extraction
projects that the well head value and natural gas rates
are on par with other provinces; renegotiating natural
gas rates and the royalty formula; encouraging oil and
gas companies to hire and train Baloch workers and
allocate funds for social development; and consulting
with the province on privatisation of the oil and gas
industry and other state-owned enterprises; and
(c) making
the provincial government a party to all investment and
development projects.
7. Refocus
policies towards human development by:
(a)
allocating an annual financial package for social sector
development pursuant to district level recommendations;
(b)
granting specific funds for hospitals, technical
institutions, medical colleges and universities, as well
as high schools in all districts; and
(c)
developing irrigation schemes, including small dams, for
rural Balochistan, on the recommendation of the
provincial government.
8. Enhance
provincial autonomy and strengthen the federation by:
(a)
eliminating the Concurrent Legislative List and
devolving all its subjects to the provinces;
(b)
constituting a bipartisan parliamentary committee to
recommend, within a fixed timeframe, the transfer of
subjects from the Federal Legislative List to the
provinces, beginning with subjects in Part II of the
list;
(c)
enacting legislation to regulate and monitor land
allotment, sales and transfers in Gwadar; and
(d)
constituting a parliamentary committee, with an equal
number of members from the ruling and opposition
benches, to examine cases of abuse of power by security
agencies.
9. Form a
high-level judicial commission to enquire into the 26
August 2006 killing of Baloch nationalist leader Nawab
Akbar Khan Bugti.
10. Urge the
Pakistan government to immediately end military action in
Balochistan.
11. Press
the Pakistan government to end all practices that violate
international human rights standards, including torture,
arbitrary arrests, detentions, and extra-judicial
killings.
Islamabad/Brussels, 14 September 2006
|
The
International Crisis Group (Brussels-based) is an independent,
non-profit, non-governmental organisation, with nearly 120 staff
members on five continents, working through field-based analysis
and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict.
http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm
|
|
Dutch Colonel Criticises
Pakistan
KANDAHAR, 16/09/06 - The highest-ranking Dutch officer in Afghanistan
expressed his frustration on Friday about the mission in the province of
Uruzgan. A constant supply of 'fresh' Taliban from Pakistan means the
Dutch troops are beating their heads against a brick wall, Colonel Arie
Vermeij suggested.
The colonel is deputy commander of the International Security Assistance
Force (ISAF). From the Southern Regional Command Centre in Kandahar, he
supervises the rebuilding tasks of the international troops in the six
southern regions of Afghanistan.
Vermeij claimed that the Taliban thwart ISAF's rebuilding efforts with
attacks and other armed activities. It would make a great difference if
neighbour Pakistan were to monitor the border area more stringently, he
said on Friday in Defensiekrant, the magazine of the Defence Ministry.
"Unfortunately, al-Qaeda supports the Taliban, who also receive help from
within Pakistan. The Pakistani government is apparently unable to deal
with the Taliban in the border area of Baluchistan and to keep the border
crossing with Afghanistan closed. About 40 percent of the Taliban,
particularly leaders, form the hard core and arrive well-trained directly
from Pakistan."
The colonel observed that the Taliban are continuously supplied with arms
from Pakistan and provided with resources such as communication equipment
and vehicles. "Our work will remain difficult as long as Pakistan does not
keep the border closed. We capture or eliminate many Taliban, but these
are replaced by new fighters from Pakistan and other countries," Vermeij
explained.
Commandant of the Armed Forces Dick Berlijn does not agree with the
colonel's analysis. In Berlijn's view, the situation is difficult but the
mission is not impossible. In addition, "consultations with Pakistan are
continuously taking place about more efforts to halt the influx. But
mountainous land is involved and the tribal structure also plays a role,"
Berlijn pointed out. "The image of continuous fighting is inaccurate. Many
projects are being carried out."
Defence Minister Henk Kamp chose Berlijn's line. The minister added that
he could imagine the NATO-led ISAF-mission would like to have more troops.
"But these will not come from the Netherlands."
http://www.nisnews.nl/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nato backs down over Pakistan ultimatum
By Ahmed Rashid in Islamabad
(Filed: 16/09/2006)
|
Key Nato
countries have decided not to issue a diplomatic ultimatum to Pakistan
which demanded that it ends its
support for the Taliban and arrests leaders living in Pakistan.
Nato is
placing all its hopes on a critical three-way meeting at the White House
on Sept 27 when President Bush is due to meet Pakistani President
Pervaiz Musharraf and Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
Two
months ago senior diplomats from four Nato countries (Britain, Canada,
Australia and the Netherlands), whose troops are fighting an estimated
8,000 Taliban in southern Afghanistan, urged their governments
collectively to issue a démarche to Pakistan's military regime.
They want
it to arrest those Taliban commanders openly operating out of Quetta,
capital of Baluchistan province, which adjoins Afghanistan.
However, after a fierce debate on the issue the démarche was cancelled,
with Nato members divided on whether or not to pressurise Pakistan.
Britain cited co-operation with Pakistani intelligence in uncovering the
recent terrorist plot to attack planes departing London airports.
But a Western ambassador in Islamabad said there was a consensus among
Nato, US and UK intelligence officers in Afghanistan that Quetta is "the
command and control centre for Taliban planning, logistics, and
recruitment in Afghanistan".
Pakistan denies that it is sponsoring the Taliban. But for the first
time since 2001 President Musharraf admitted this week in Brussels that
the Taliban are using Pakistani soil to carry out attacks in
Afghanistan.
The recent intense fighting in southern Afghanistan is partly a Taliban
attempt to carve out a safe haven where its leaders can reside during
the winter months when fighting winds down.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ |
War against Pak to intensify:
Marri
Asian News
International
Karachi, September 15, 2006
http://www.hindustantimes.com
Eighty-two year-old Sardar
Khari Baksh Marri has now donned the mantle of Baloch leadership after the
August 26 killing of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti.
In an exclusive interview to the agency, Marri said: "There is no
possibility of a peaceful dialogue with Islamabad and the war for
Balochistan's liberation is now going to intensify."
Khair Baksh Marri is the leader of the Marri tribe, the biggest tribe of
Balochistan.
While Akbar Khan Bugti was the sardar of one tribe, Marri is seen as the
sardar of all Balochistan, and in that sense, he holds the greater sway
over Baluchistan. He is wanted by the authorities and is on the run.
When asked about the violence characterising the Baloch struggle against
Islamabad, Marri said: "A peace dialogue with Islamabad is now useless.
The war continues and whoever wins this war, will win Balochistan."
Another point made by Marri was that the Baloch struggle was primarily
directed against the Punjabis.
"Our war is against Punjabis and the exploitation that they have done of
our province," Marri said.
He specifically mentioned the Gwadar Port, and said that the Balochistan
Liberation Army (BLA) "will drive out all Punjabis from the Gwadar area".
Marri said that the resources in Balochistan belonged to the Baloch people
and "no one will be allowed to exploit it".
In the interview, Marri made it clear that the Balochis were "no longer
interested in autonomy, but in complete independence."
"Our freedom struggle has started, and we will take Balochistan to its
pre-1947 position. Our annexation by Pakistan was illegal, and we will
reverse it," Marri said.
When asked about the BLA, 50
percent of whose members reportedly come from the Marri tribe, Marri was
full of praise for their role in the struggle to free Balochistan from the
yoke of Islamabad.
"If my health had permitted, I would have led the BLA," Marri said.
"The BLA is in good hands and it will strike very hard at Pakistani
interests in the days to come," he further added.
Marri explained that there was a feeling of complete alienation among
Balochis is so far as Islamabad was concerned, and no amount of placating
or statements from Islamabad "would make any difference to the cause".
Marri's views on Baluchistan came even as the International Crisis Group (ICG)
called on the Pakistan Government to stop military action against the BLA
in Balochistan.
The ICG urged the Musharraf regime to talk with political parties to
resolve the conflict.
It warned that the conflict in gas-rich Balochistan could intensify if the
government pressed on with an offensive against the BLA, which is fighting
for independence from the rest of Pakistan.
Federal Information Minister Mohammed Ali Durrani has rejected the ICG
report, which says that, "by choosing confrontation, the Musharraf
Government bears responsibility for the state of the conflict."
"The only one way out is to end all military action, release political
prisoners and respect constitutionally guaranteed political freedoms," the
ICG report adds.
Noting that several people have been killed in violent street protests and
bomb blasts in the wake of Bugti's death, the report further warns
Islamabad that that people in Pakistan's largest province are unhappy
about a lack of political representation.
'Sheer force' The ICG report says has only heightened the demand for more
autonomy and this has widespread support among the population of the
province.
"The military government should recognise that it faces conflict not with
a handful of sardars [tribal chiefs], but with a broad-based movement for
political, economic and social empowerment.
The military can retain control over Balochistan's territory through sheer
force, but it cannot defeat an insurgency that has local support," the ICG
says.
Government officials say a handful of tribal chiefs are behind the trouble
in the province, because they fear their power base would be eroded by
government plans to develop the region.
President Musharraf has pledged major infrastructure projects in
Balochistan to win back lost support, while also promising to deal firmly
with the militants.
Meanwhile, the Pakistan Senate is continuing its debate on the Balochistan
situation.
One of its members, Colonel (retired) Tahir Mushhadi called for the
re-introduction of civilised norms to pave the way for a political
solution to all problems besetting the province.
He said miscreants involved in anti-state activities, should be singled
out and action be taken against them.
Mushhadi said all the political players should be treated equally and
there should be no political victimisation.
He said political differences are to be resolved through dialogues and
every one should work to promote democratic norms in the country.
Saadia Abbasi said Balochistan should be seen as an important unit of the
federation and it must have all the rights as envisaged in the
Constitution.
Babar Awan said that Baloch leaders had responded positively and cast
their vote in favour of establishment of a Muslim land when Pakistan
became independent in 1947, while Kulsoom Parveen said some political
circles wanted to cash in on emotions of the Baloch people.
She said no one should exploit the political situation in Balochistan for
personal benefit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demonstration
against Gen Musharaf
21-09-2006
Balochistan Action Committee-UK in association with World Sindhi Congress,
Baluchistan Rights Movement and Sindhi-Baluch Forum is staging a big
demonstration against Gen Musharaf on his visit to the British Prime
Minister’s Country House, the Chequers on Thursday 28th
September 2006 to protest vigorously against target killing of our great
leader Nawab Akbar Bugti on 26th August 2006 and against
Pakistani Army for its ongoing brutal military operation in Balochistan
and it’s extra-judicial arrest of thousands of Baloch activists.
Balochistan
Action Committee-UK appeals to all Baloch and Sindhi in the UK and Europe to
actively participate and come to the Chequers to express their detest to Gen
Musharaf for target killing of Nawab Bugti, military operation and grotesque
violation of human-rights in Balochistan and his refusal to recognise Baloch
nation’s legitimate rights.
Balochistan
Action Committee-UK
Venue: The Chequers
Durmond Lane
Prince Risborough,
Buckinghamshire, UK
Transportation by coaches will be provided (pick-up point shall be announced
once the numbers of participants are confirmed).
Contact: Baloch
by E.mail balochactions@yahoo.co.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karachi Baloch newsman missing
21-06-2006
By Our Staff Reporter
KARACHI, Sept 20: A journalist working for a local English daily went
missing on Wednesday. Saeed Sarbazi left home in the Old Town in his car
in the morning. He neither reached his office nor the press club, the
places he usually went, his wife said, adding his mobile phone was
switched off.
The family lodged a report at the Eidgah Police station. City police chief
Niaz Siddiqui said that police had been informed about the disappearance
of Mr Sarbazi. “We are trying to find him,” he added.
Chief of the Citizen-Police Liaison Committee Sharfuddin Memon said that
he had been informed about it and the CPLC was making efforts to locate
him.
Meanwhile, Karachi Press Club President Ghazi Salahuddin, Secretary Najeeb
Ahmed, members of the governing body and office-bearers of the Karachi
Union of Journalists have expressed concern over the mysterious
disappearance of Mr Sarbazi and called upon the authorities concerned to
ensure his safe and early recovery
ARIF BALOCH > BALOCHISTAN EXPRESS KARACHI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the sample letter below
that I just sent to Committee to Protect Journalists
2109-2006
Please everyone must send email to
info@cpj.org
Please include your address and phone number.
Dear CPJ:
A senior journalist working for a local English daily went missing on
Wednesday, presumably abducted by Pakistan's intelligence services.
Saeed Sarbazi, a journalist of ethnic Baloch origin, left home in the Old
Town in his car in the morning. He neither reached his office nor the
press club, the
places he usually went, his wife said, adding his mobile phone was
switched off.
The family lodged a report at the Eidgah Police station.
City police chief Niaz Siddiqui said that police had been informed about
the disappearance of Mr Sarbazi. “We are trying to find him,” he added.
Chief of the Citizen-Police Liaison Committee Sharfuddin Memon said that
he had been informed about it and the CPLC was making efforts to locate
him.
Sarbazi was active both at the Karachi Press Club and Karchi Union of
Journalists.
Meanwhile, Karachi Press Club President Ghazi Salahuddin, Secretary Najeeb
Ahmed, members of the governing body and office-bearers of the Karachi
Union
of Journalists have expressed concern over the mysterious disappearance of
Mr Sarbazi and called upon the authorities concerned to ensure his safe
and early
recovery.
I request the CPJ office to immediately contact Pakistan coup leader, army
general Pervez Musharraf who is staying at the Roosevelt Hotel in New
York.
I also urge you to please convey your concern to President Bush, who
Musharraf will be meeting on September 22 about the state of human rights
in the occupied territories of Balochistan. A full-scale army operation is
underway in the province and Sarbazi's sympathy for his people was not a
secret.
You might be knowing the Miltary Intelligence in Pakistan is calling the
shots in Balochistan as Pakistan army is ruthlessly quelling the Baloch
resistance.
Sincerely,
Ahmar Khan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bush Should Press Pakistani
General Musharraf to End Military Rule
Tuesday, September 19 2006
@ 11:37 PM EDT
|
|
Human Rights Watch 2006
News and Releases
Compiled by Kandy Ringer |
|
|
|
U.S. Should Not Turn Blind Eye on Torture,
Discrimination Against Women in Thailand
HRW via BBSNews - New York, September 20, 2006 -- When U.S.
President George W. Bush meets with Pakistan’s General Pervez
Musharraf on September 22, he should press the Pakistani military
ruler to restore civilian rule, hold free and fair elections, and end
legal discrimination against women, Human Rights Watch said today.
|
|
Map of Pakistan, 2004.
Photo Credit: The University of Texas at Austin.
|
|
The map shown above in it's full size is available in
BBSNews Maps. |
Human Rights Watch urged President Bush to stop turning a blind eye
to Musharraf’s use of torture and "disappearances" in the fight
against terrorism and in Pakistan’s political conflicts. The two
leaders are scheduled to meet on the sidelines of the United Nations
General Assembly.
"If Bush is serious about fostering democracy in the Muslim world,
how can he support Musharraf’s refusal to end military rule in
Pakistan?" said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch.
"President Bush should make it clear that the U.S won’t stand by as it
did in the past when Musharraf subverted the Pakistani constitution
and staged flawed elections."
The Pakistani constitution prohibits the chief of the army from
holding a political office. Musharraf in 2003 promised to step down as
either army chief or president, but reneged the following year. Recent
statements by Musharraf and military-backed politicians have made
clear that he intends to stay on as army chief and president beyond
the date set for elections in 2007. They have also suggested that he
could be somehow re-elected president by the outgoing parliament,
which may try to extend its term unilaterally by one year to do so in
2008.
Despite many commitments, President Musharraf has thus far failed
to end legal discrimination against women. The infamous Hudood
Ordinances, among other things, criminalize adultery and non-marital
sex in Pakistan. Under this set of laws, thousands of women have been
imprisoned for so-called "honor" crimes, including rape and sexual
assault against them. The laws have rendered most victims of sexual
assault unable to seek redress through the criminal justice system; it
deems these women guilty of illegal sex rather than victims of
unlawful sexual abuse or violence.
Earlier this month, the Musharraf-backed ruling party, the Pakistan
Muslim League, reached an agreement with the moderate opposition
Pakistan Peoples Party to make procedural changes to the Hudood
Ordinances that would allow women charged with adultery to post bail.
These reforms would also permit rape victims to file charges under the
criminal law instead of religious law, which requires producing four
male witnesses to prove rape. But last week Musharraf backtracked on
the accord to seek an agreement with the Islamist Muttaheda
Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) alliance, which opposes any meaningful changes. As
a result, the Hudood Ordinances remain in place.
"If Musharraf wanted to end legal discrimination against women, he
could do so by seeking support from the majority of the National
Assembly members who favor legal reforms," said Adams. "Instead, he
sought an alliance with the Islamist political parties that have made
clear their opposition to women’s rights."
In response to domestic and international criticism, the government
announced on Tuesday that it would submit the bill in its original
form to the National Assembly in late September or early October.
"Promises about reform of the Hudood Ordinances have been made and
broken many times already," said Adams. "This is the last chance for
the government to show its sincerity."
Human Rights Watch noted that the Pakistani military is the
country’s leading violator of human rights. Under Musharraf, military
impunity for abuses has increased dramatically. These abuses include
extrajudicial killings, torture, arbitrary arrests and the persecution
of political opponents. Pakistan’s military and its intelligence
agencies have tortured and forcibly disappeared dozens of people in
the volatile southwestern province of Balochistan where they have been
facing an armed rebellion by tribal militants operating under the
umbrella of the Balochistan Liberation Army.
"Perpetrators of torture must be removed from Pakistan's security
forces and prosecuted," said Adams. "During their meeting in New York,
President Bush should tell Musharraf just that the Pakistani
military’s rampant abuses must end."
Human Rights Watch has also investigated a pattern of
"disappearances," arbitrary detention and torture in counterterrorism
operations in Karachi, Lahore and other major cities and towns in
Pakistan. Some of these cases have involved U.S. law enforcement or
intelligence agents. Just as the United States has done with "high
value" suspects, Pakistan has continued to "disappear" suspects in the
campaign again terrorism and other conflicts. Human Rights Watch urged
both Pakistan and the United States to take concrete measures to end
the practice of using enforced disappearances, arbitrary detention and
torture as part of counterterrorism efforts.
"The counterterrorism partnership between the U.S. and Pakistan
should start to follow the rule of law rather than the law of the
jungle," said Adams.
http://bbsnews.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Khan of Kalat calls for grand Jirga of
Baloch Sardars
Islamabad, Sept 21: The former ruler of the erstwhile princely state
of Kalat, which formed part of Balochistan, is convening a meeting of
tribal elders today to discuss the situation arising out of the
killing of rebel leader Nawab Akbar Bugti in a Pakistani military
operation.
Kalat Sardar Suleman Daud, who strongly criticised Bugti`s killing,
called for the `Jirga` in Kalat to discuss the situation in
Balochistan.
Several Baloch sardars or tribal leaders and important personalities
from Sindh and Punjab are likely to take part in the Jirga, `Daily
Times` reported.
The meeting was tipped to be one of the most important gatherings of
Baloch tribal chiefs, the report said. The last such Jirga was
convened in 1887 by then Khan of Kalat, Khan Khudaidad Khan.
Baloch chieftains supporting Pakistan government have not been invited
to the Jirga, the report said.
Kalat was a former princely state located at the centre of the modern
province of Balochistan. It was founded in 1638.
On March 31, 1948, the state acceded to Pakistan which went on to form
the Balochistan states union on October 3, 1952 with three
neighbouring states. The state of Kalat ceased to exist from October
14, 1955 when the province of West Pakistan was formed.
Bugti`s killing evoked strong nationalist sentiments in Balochistan,
where the rebels have been agitating for more provincial autonomy.
Baloch nationalist parties have held several protest rallies since the
killing of Bugti in a military raid on August 26.
Bureau Report
http://www.zeenews.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan urged to end Baluch offensive
Friday 22 September 2006
http://english.aljazeera.net/
Tribal chieftains in Pakistan's
southwestern Baluchistan province have called for an end to military
operations in the gas-rich region where militants are fighting for
more autonomy.
The demand came at a meeting of tribal jirga (council) attended by
heads of more than 80 Baluch tribes in the city of Qalat.
A declaration, issued at the end of the day-long meeting, read: "The
military operations are state-terrorism. These must be stopped."
The jirga was convened in the wake of the killing of Nawab Akbar Khan
Bugti, a veteran Baluch rebel leader, in a military offensive on
August 26.
Several people were killed in violent street protests and bomb blasts
after Bugti's death, which analysts said would exacerbate trouble in
Pakistan's biggest but least-developed and most sparsely populated
province.
The jirga called on international human rights groups to conduct an
investigation into the killing.
Insurgency
Baluchis have been waging a low-key insurgency for decades in
Baluchistan but tensions have increased since the death of 79-year-old
Bugti.
The Brussels-based International Crisis Group has warned that conflict
in the province on the border with Afghanistan and Iran could
intensify if the Pakistani government presses on with an offensive
against rebels.
Baluchis complain of a lack of political representation and say their
province's resources are used to the benefit of Pakistan's other
provinces, most notably Punjab, while Baluchistan is neglected.
The province of mountains and deserts sits on Pakistan's biggest
reserves of natural gas.
Government officials say a handful of tribal chiefs are stirring up
trouble, fearing their power base would be eroded by government plans
to develop the region.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grand jirga in Kalat decides to move ICJ
By Saleem Shahid http://www.dawn.com/
KALAT, Sept 21: A grand Baloch jirga, convened here on Thursday after
about 126 years, announced in a declaration that a case would be filed
in the International Court of Justice against what it termed violation
of agreements signed by the State of Kalat, the Crown of Britain and
the government of Pakistan pertaining to sovereignty and rights of the
Baloch people.
The Khan of Kalat, Mir Suleman Daud Ahmedzai, presided over the jirga
held in the Shahi Hall. It was attended by 85 tribal chiefs and about
300 elders.
The declaration expressed concern over the ‘colonial occupation’ of
the Baloch land by Punjab in violation of the accord signed by the
state of Kalat and the government of Pakistan in 1948.
The declaration was read out by the chief of Jhalawan, Sardar
Sanaullah Zehri. It described the ongoing military operation in
Balochistan as state terrorism and called for an immediate end to the
operation and release all arrested political workers.
It rejected the Sui tribal jirga’s decision to abolish the Sardari
system in the Bugti area and termed the action taken at the behest of
the government an interference in tribal affairs and said that tribal
matters should be resolved in accordance with customs and traditions.
The declaration said that the jirga recognised the heirs of Nawab
Akbar Bugti as legitimate owners of the property of the deceased,
adding that it would resist allotment of the property to anyone other
than the heirs.
The jirga condemned the tragic incident of Aug 26 in which Nawab Bugti
was killed and demanded an investigation into the cause of his death
by the International Human Rights Commission to ascertain the factual
position.
The declaration rejected the mega development projects, including the
Gwadar uplift programme, and said that the Baloch people would not
accept the agreements signed by the government with international
companies.
The declaration demanded reunification of all divided Baloch lands
into one entity.
In his speech, the Khan of Kalat said that the presence of so many
sardars in the Baloch national jirga belied the claim of President
Pervez Musharraf that 72 tribal chiefs were supporting his policy. He
asserted that all Baloch people would abide the decision of the jirga.
Chief of Sarawan Nawab Aslam Raisani said that in accordance with the
1940 Resolution, all nationalities should get their rights, and except
currency, foreign affairs, defence and communications all subjects
should be transferred to provinces.
He said that after capturing power, President Musharraf had assured to
work for promoting harmony, but now the military rulers wanted to
resolve issues at gun-point. He said that if Kashmiris fighting for
their rights were called freedom fighters, the Baloch should not be
dubbed terrorists.
Sardar Sanaullah Zehri said that the Baloch people were unfortunate
that despite having abundant resources, long coasts and a rich
culture, they were being oppressed by outsiders who had occupied their
land. The use of gun, he said, could suppress them for some time but
they would again rise for their rights.
Chief of BNP (Mengal) Sardar Akhtar Mengal said that the Khan of Kalat
had gathered all the Baloch at a time when the attention of
international and regional powers was focused on Balochistan.
Sardar Mengal said that the Baloch people would live with honour,
dignity and equal rights and with complete control over their
resources. Otherwise, he warned, they would be free to take a decision
to protect their sovereign status.
Chief of Magsi tribe Nawab Zulfiqar Ali Magsi said that had the grand
jirga been convened when security forces attacked Nawab Bugti, and not
after his death, the situation would have been different today. He
said that some forces were trying to exploit the matter politically.
He also said that no-one must forget that “we had taken oath as
governors, chief ministers and ministers on the Constitution that we
are now opposing”. He called for abiding by the decision of the jirga.
Nawab Muhammad Khan Shahwani, Dr Hakim Lehri, chief of Balochistan
National Congress, Sardar Asif Mengal, Sardarzada Jehanzeb, Mir
Amanullah Zarakzai, Sardar Nadir Badini, Sardar Rahimdad Lango, BSO
chairman Mohinuddin Baloch, Yousuf Masti Khan, Sardar Balkhsher Mazari,
Amanullah Kanrani of the JWP, Mir Taj Muhammad Jamali, Sardar Aslam
Bizenjo, Baloch Students Organisation chairman Bashirzeb Baloch and
Sardar Sher Jamaldini also addressed the Jirga.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baloch leaders for pre-1947 status
Nirupama Subramanian
22-09-2006 Jirgato move ICJ on
territorial integrity http://www.hindu.com/
ISLAMABAD: A grand jirga of 95 Baloch
tribal chiefs and 300 other prominent Baloch leaders has said it will
move the International Court of Justice against what it termed the
violation of its "territorial integrity, exploitation of Balochistan's
natural resources, denial of the Baloch right to the ownership of
their resources and the military operation in the province."
A declaration adopted by the jirga, reportedly the first in 126 years,
protested the "colonial occupation' of Baloch land by Pakistan. It was
held in Kalat, near the Baloch provincial capital Quetta.
The Khan of Kalat, whose ancestor signed the accession of the former
princely state of Kalat with Pakistan, presided over the jirga.
Violation of agreement
The accession was a package deal that incorporated three other
neighbouring states into Balochistan. The jirga condemned Pakistan for
repeated violations of the agreement which had promised complete
autonomy to Balochistan.
The declaration condemned the killing of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, and
called for an immediate end to the military operation, which it
described as state terrorism. It also demanded the immediate release
of all political prisoners.
The jirga rejected the decision by a Bugti clan — rival to the late
Nawab and propped up by the Government — to abolish the Sardari
system, describing it as interference by the Government in tribal
affairs.
The declaration also rejected all the "mega projects" started by the
Government in Balochistan, such as the Gwadar port, and said the
Baloch would not accept agreements signed between the Government and
international companies.
It demanded a reunification of all Baloch areas, now distributed
between Punjab and Sindh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balochistan grand jirga calls for
restoration of pre-partition status of the province
Friday September 22, 2006 (0326 PST)
http://www.paktribune.com/
KALAT: The ever grand jirga in the history of
Balochistan has been held under Khan of Kalat after 130 years calling
upon people of Balochistan to unite on one platform to seek
restoration of pre-partition status of Balochistan besides condemning
the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti.
The jirga was held in Shahi Jirga Hall here Thursday. Over 95 tribal
chiefs from Balochistan, Punjab and Sindh, tribal elders and Nawabs
besides people in large number attended the jirga. Nawab of Kalat Mir
Suleman Khan presided over jirga.
Chief of Chalawan, Sardar Sana Ullah Zehri, Chief of Sarwan, Nawab
Aslam Raeesani, Mir Balakh Sher Mazari, Sardar Yar Muhammad Jamali,
Sardar Akhtar Jan Mengal, Nawab Zulfiqar Ali Magsi, former chief
minister Sardar Taj Muhammad Jamali, Sardar Aziz Ahmad Lehri and
others participated in the jirga.
The speakers while addressing the jirga said there is no room left for
Baloch nation to live in Pakistan now. Balochistan was an independent
state and it was not part of united India. It was forcibly annexed to
Pakistan and Baloch nation was divided in three provinces of Punjab,
Sindh and Balochistan under a conspiracy. The border line of the
province be abolished.
They underlined that the need is there that all the political parties
and people of Balochistan are united under one flag to achieve this
objective.
The speakers alleged the blood carnage is raging in Balochistan. The
rulers are meeting out step motherly treatment to the province. Our
political parties should get untied on one platform and work out
strategy to challenge Pakistan-Balochistan annexation accord in
international court of justice.
They demanded the people of Balochistan be give access to the
resources of their province.
An interview of Nawab Akbar Bugti recorded by a Balochi radio was also
relayed at the conclusion of jirga. This saddened the environment.
Bugti said in interview that his war is for protection of sovereignty
of Baloch nation and their rights. We are not anti development. The
development is that which is in accordance with the requirement of
Baloch nation. On the other hand government dubs establishment of
garrisons and air fields as development, he added.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan 'role in Mumbai attacks'
BBC News
Saturday, 30 September 2006
Seven blasts hit Mumbai's busy commuter network
Pakistan's intelligence agency was behind the train blasts in Mumbai
in July that killed 186 people, Indian police say.
The attacks were planned by the ISI and carried out by the Islamist
militant group Lashkar-e-Toiba, based in Pakistan, Mumbai's police
chief said.
AN Roy said the Students' Islamic Movement of India had also assisted.
Pakistan rejected the allegations and said India had given no evidence
of Pakistani involvement in the attacks.
"We have solved the 11 July bombings case. The whole attack was
planned by Pakistan's ISI and carried out by Lashkar-e-Toiba and their
operatives in India," Mumbai (Bombay) police commissioner AN Roy told
a news conference.
'Baseless'
Mr Roy said 15 people had been arrested, and that some of the bombers
had received training in Pakistan.
Tariq Azim Khan, Pakistan's minister of state for information,
rejected the allegations.
The Mumbai police chief said the investigation was complete
"We are still studying the Indian statement. Needless to say, this is
once again baseless allegations - yet another attempt by India to
malign Pakistan," he told the BBC.
"Both the president and the prime minister condemned this terrorist
attack on the train when it happened. But India also must look at home
for reasons for this growing insurgency at home," he said.
On 11 July 2006, seven co-ordinated blasts within 15 minutes ripped
through trains on Mumbai's busy commuter network.
Indian security officials suggested early on in their investigations
that the bombings bore the hallmarks of Lashkar-e-Toiba, a leading
militant group fighting in Kashmir and based in Pakistan.
Pakistan denied any involvement in the blasts and Lashkar-e-Toiba
condemned the attacks.
India postponed talks with Pakistan after the bombs, but Indian Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf met
recently in Cuba and said they had agreed to resume talks.
The two nations, both nuclear armed, have fought three wars since
independence, two over the disputed territory of Kashmir.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thousands prisoned in
Pakistan Army run detention camps in Balochistan
Daily Times
Dated 30/9/2006
According to a leading Pakistani
newspaper, over 3,000 political prisoners, mainly activists and
political opponents of General Musharraf, are being illegally detained
in camps run by the Army and Intelligence Agencies in Balochistan.
Daily Times quotes: Balochistan continues to remain the hub of illegal
detentions and mysterious disappearances of political activists and
family members of political leaders.
According to unofficial estimates, around 3,000 political activists,
relatives of political leaders and ordinary citizens of Balochistan
are being detained by intelligence agencies. Relatives of those
detained usually have no information on the whereabouts of their loved
ones. The government has also not registered any cases against the
detained suspects.
Government sources said that scores of suspected terrorists, mainly
Baloch supporters of the Balochistan Liberation Army, are in
government custody due to their alleged involvement in militant
activity in the province.
Some of these suspects have been missing for years.
"My uncle, Ali Asghar Bungulzai, 38, went missing on October 18,
2001," Nasruallah Baloch, the nephew of the missing tailor, told Daily
Times. "Soon after his abduction, intelligence officials came to our
house and admitted that Ali was in their custody," he said, adding
that the family was told that Ali was being interrogated regarding
some ‘sensitive issues' and would soon be released.
"But now the same agency denies abducting Ali. They say he is no
longer in their custody. We don't know where he is," he added.
Hafeez Baloch's brother Hafiz Saeed Bungulzai went missing on July 4,
2003. Baloch said that an intelligence agency submitted before the
Balochistan High Court (BHC) that his brother was being interrogated
but they still did not know where he is. "They did not even allow my
mother to meet Saeed despite BHC directives," Baloch said.
"We were told that Saeed was in the custody of government agencies but
he has not been sentenced by a court of law," he said. Human rights
activists have expressed agreement with an Amnesty International
| |