حزب مردم بلوچستان  Balochistan People’s Party  بلوچستانءِ اُستمانءِ گــَل

 

 

Proud to be a Pakistani!

By Mohammad Ali Talpur

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

The worsening of the situation in all aspects of life crucial to the very existence of the state left me stumped regarding the choice of a topic for writing about to highlight the misery and plight of the common people and the arrogance of the self-righteous ruling elite. However I did find a solution to my dilemma. In August last year the prestigious hard hitting monthly Karachi journal founded by late Razia Bhatti had elicited views on questions centring on the title of the column. I had answered the same, and this was published unedited. I thought of sharing my views with the readers on a larger scale and at the same time agitate their minds regarding their attitude and response to the posed question. So here we are:

1) Are you proud to be a Pakistani? If yes, why? If not, why not?

It is difficult to be proud of a country where members of different sects blow up each other and places of worship, where cantonments are needed to pacify people, where the expenditure on health and education is a minute fraction of what is spent on defence and junkets by its rulers, where the Dr Shazia Khalids, Mukhtaran Mais and Samia Sarwars cannot even dream of justice being done, where the judiciary obliges the rulers with its Doctrine of Necessity, where half the country is lost and no one is found answerable, where the Kalabagh Dam and Greater Thal canal are built disregarding the wishes of minority provinces, where the Governor of a province receives welfare money from the UK, where the Ghotki train disaster happens and no one resigns, where absconders from the law can and do become ministers, where a single call from Colin Powell can bring a sea change in our policy, where bullet-proof Mercedes are bought for billions while the public crowds into vehicles like sardines, where the overwhelming majority has no potable water and the Prime Minister’s and President’s House spend millions on bottled water, where self-immolation is the way to bring one’s plight to notice, where the politicos have loans written off and become Prime Ministers in to the bargain. The list is long and torturous and could continue indefinitely. Not being able to feel proud is negative. I wish the rulers here had done something to make me feel proud.

2) In your opinion, what were the highest and lowest points in Pakistan’s history?

I wish there were some high points which I could have enumerated. The low points abound. To begin with, the forcible annexation of Balochistan and the subsequent brutal repression there, then we come to Liaqat Ali Khan’s assassination, the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly and the Judiciary’s acceptance of the same, the Martial Law of Ayub Khan, the action against Baloch and the hanging of seven Baloch in Hyderabad jail, the incarceration of Nawab Nauroz Khan, the rigging of the election against Mohtarma Fatima Jinnah, the denial of the right to rule to the majority Awami League, the wanton military action in East Pakistan, the abject surrender of General A.K.Niazi, a civilian becoming the Chief Martial Law Administrator, the dismissal of duly elected governments of Balochistan and NWFP in 1973, and then the subsequent Army action against the Baloch, the Martial law of Ziaul Haq, the money from Yunus Habib of Mehran Bank to form the IJI, the assault on the Supreme Court led by leading lights of today’s set up, the exploding of nuclear devices in Balochistan and subsequent radiation and fallout, the freezing of foreign accounts, the Kargil disaster and its cover up, the semi-Martial Law of General Musharraf, the u-turn of a policy (wrong though) due to a single call from Colin Powell, the deafening silence at the unjust and brutal US military action against the Iraqi people, the uncovering of the nuclear technology black-market headed by Dr. Qadeer, the manhandling of journalists on Press Freedom Day. The list keeps getting longer by the day.

3) Which are the three Pakistanis you are proud of and three Pakistanis you are disappointed in?

I am proud of Dr. Allama Iqbal, I.I.Kazi, Janab Faiz Ahmad Faiz and Mir Sher Mohammad Marri. But I wonder were they alive today, would they take pride in being a Pakistani? I am disappointed not with three individuals but with three institutions and they are: the Armed Forces, the Judiciary and the Bureaucracy.

4) You are President. Which three things would you change?

If I were the President the first thing that I would do is to ensure that education is universal and that there aren’t two tiers of education, i.e. one for the elite and one for the masses. The same would apply to universal health care for all citizens. This would be achieved by allocating the present defence budget for the purpose and naturally the present budget for these would be allocated for defence, and that would not only be to depoliticize the armed forces, but also reduce its influence and numbers drastically and consequently its much deplored role in our social, political and economic life, forever.

There is a lot of talk about how the 1973 Constitution has been made sacrosanct, but the country has come a long way from those days and needs to have a new constitution which would respect the rights of minority provinces and also ensure human rights and freedom. The constitution should be formed after Truth Commissions have investigated and decided upon the past injustices against the provinces and the people in general.

Last but not the least, the rule of law would be established in place of elitist rule and all would be equally answerable for their deeds and misdeeds before the law. No president or prime minister would be allowed to go on junkets, nor would they be allowed to inconvenience the people by creating traffic jams in the name of their security, nor would corrupt politicos be allowed to have their loans written off; in fact all the written-off loans would be returned to the people, along with interest. The rule of law would bring about transparency in all state functions.

When a regime loses its meaning, supposing that it ever had any, it becomes increasingly repressive and isolated. It remains concerned only about its survival at any cost, and this is exactly what we have been witnessing here for nearly 58 years. This has been the source of all the miseries and problems that the people have been subjected to, and will continue to be subjected to for the foreseeable future, unless, of course, they decide to become the masters of their own fate.

This country is in dire need of people’s active involvement and action in matters related to every aspect of the state. The fate of a country is too important a matter to be left to the whims of military or political godfathers. The salvation of this country lies in the development of a responsible civil society. This is certainly not impossible, but it will come at a price. It would be better to pay a price now, rather than pay the ultimate price eventually.

The writer has been associated with the Baloch national struggle

Source: The Post