حزب مردم بلوچستان  Balochistan People’s Party  بلوچستانءِ اُستمانءِ گــَل

 

 

East Timor, Montenegro, and the emerging Kurdistan

Sunday, June 18, 2006

KurdishMedia.com - By Matthew Lanier

A number of events which have unfolded in the last five years have had profound implications for the future of the greater Kurdistan region. In 2002 the tiny territory of East Timor achieved independence from its giant neighbor Indonesia, and this year with just 55.4% in favor the people of Montenegro voted to end their nation's union with Serbia and become an independent state.

In both cases, there are lessons to be learned. East Timor, which was born out of violence, descended into anarchy and disarray earlier this year.

Montenegro, on the other hand, has seen a very smooth and peaceful dissolution of its union with Serbia and international recognition of its status as an independent nation.

Though the Kurds of northern Iraq represent perhaps only 15% of the global Kurdish population, they unquestionably wield more power and are more vocal than their oft-marginalized ethnic brothers within the region. The unofficial referendum of early 2005 showed the near universal desire for immediate independence for those living in southern Kurdistan. The 98% in favor of independence is far higher than in both the East Timor and Montenegro referendums, and there is a growing global understanding of the depth of Kurdish aspirations for self-determination.

Despite the present momentum, a solution for the Kurds must be 1) realistic in nature, 2) well-planned, and 3) properly executed. In terms of being realistic, there must be an acceptance of the current geopolitical realities within the region. Turkey, Syria, and Iran are all burgeoning powers seeking to assert themselves. But it is also important to note that the case of East Timor has shown that military power is not all that is involved in achieving independence.

It can also be said, however, that the recent anarchy in East Timor has likely changed international opinion on supporting desperately poor regions in their fight for independence. Along the same lines, Montenegro's political and economic stability likely played a key role in its peaceful independence. Thus, it is clear that the Kurds of southern Kurdistan must strive for economic autonomy and, in a broader sense, socio-economic prosperity. The KRG government has put an emphasis on this aspect and should be praised for doing so. However, more must done, especially in attracting investment in the Kurdish region's potentially explosive energy sector. With widespread development and a booming economy the demands of the Kurds will be impossible to deny.

If Kurdish independence is to ever come the planning for it must begin now. Activists of a Greater Kurdistan have previously noted the importance of the development or recognition of a Kurdish lingua franca. Such efforts should absolutely be supported both by academia and by government institutions. If the Zionists could resurrect a dead language that now has more than seven million speakers a solution for the various Kurdish languages can be found.

Perhaps most importantly, the Kurdish diaspora must be sought out and included in the crafting of an independent Kurdistan. According to one source, four million Kurds are presently living in Western democracies.

Assuming a per capita income of $20,000, this segment of the diaspora has an economic output of $80 billion annually. The most optimistic estimate would put the economic output of regions under the control of the Kurdistan Regional Government at $15 billion. This is simply one representation of the relative power of the diaspora. Many also have an incredible academic and intellectual capacity which could help Kurdistan become the most progressive nation in the region.

It is also important that any future independence for southern Kurdistan be properly implemented. It must be peaceful while at the same time clearly asserting the overwhelming solidarity of the Kurdish people. And independence in one region must not lead to hasty decisions in surrounding areas. The initial independence will simply be the first step in a much broader movement to establish a progressive, modern Kurdistan that will reshape the way the world sees the Middle East, for it must always be remembered that when all has been said and done the Kurds have no friends but the mountains.

http://www.kurdmedia.com